AI – ‘Based on the fact that a depiction in antiquity was exclusively textual and lacked a visual counterpart, several conclusions can be drawn regarding the cultural, technological, and communicative context of that era.

1. The Primacy of Text over Sight (Ekphrasis) 

• Reliance on Imagination: A textual-only description implies the creator relied on the audience’s mental imagery rather than visual representation, reflecting a culture that valued detailed, verbal “painting with words” (ekphrasis).
• Symbolic Over Realist: In many ancient contexts, there was a stronger preference for abstract or symbolic representation rather than veristic (realistic) accuracy. A textual description may have been deemed more effective for conveying complex, symbolic, or religious meanings than a 2D image, which might be interpreted too literally. 

2. Contextual Limitations and Priorities

• Subject Matter Considerations: The subject may have been deemed “unsayable” or too complex to be fully captured by available artistic techniques.
• Cultural Constraints: The lack of visual imagery might stem from cultural restrictions or traditions, such as aniconism (the avoidance of images of divine beings), which were sometimes used to define cultural identity against other groups, as seen in Herodotus’s account of the Persians.
• Focus on Utility: The text likely served a functional purpose—describing an action or a, list of characteristics—rather than a decorative one. 

3. The Nature of Ancient Evidence

• The “Written World” Context: The Roman world and other ancient societies were deeply literate, with text often being the primary mode of transmitting detailed information. The absence of a visual counterpart does not indicate a lower status of the object, but rather a preference for textual documentation.
• Materiality and Access: A text-only description might suggest the object being described was transitory, lost, or inaccessible to the general public, making a written record the only way to “preserve” it. 

4. Interpretation Challenges for Historians

• The “Paper Trail” Bias: Such descriptions reflect a specific perspective—often that of an elite observer or author—which may be biased or incomplete compared to what a visual record might have provided.
• Tacit Knowledge Dependency: These descriptions often indicate that full understanding required “personal experience” or “direct encounter” with the object, as the text was merely intended as a signpost to evoke, rather than fully replicate, the visual experience.’

AI – ‘Symbolism in Islamic art conveys spiritual, philosophical, and theological concepts—principally divine unity (Tawhid) and infinity—without using figurative imagery. Key elements include complex geometric patterns, arabesque, and calligraphy, which transform spaces into meditative, heavenly environments. These motifs reflect the orderly nature of creation. 

• Geometric Patterns (Girih): These represent the infinite nature of Allah and the order of the cosmos. Circles symbolize God’s unity and mercy, squares represent the earthly realm (and four directions of prayer), and octagons symbolize paradise. The repetition implies that in a small element, one can find the infinite.
• Arabesque and Floral Motifs: The intricate, flowing, and repeating nature of plant-based designs signifies the eternal, life-affirming nature of the divine. Specific symbols include the tulip for sublimation and the rose for embracing religious doctrine.
• Calligraphy: As the direct representation of the Quran, script (often Quranic verses) is a primary art form, serving to remember and praise Allah.
• Light and Color: Light is a symbol of God, frequently represented through gold (enlightenment) and polished surfaces. Black is used in some traditions to represent the pre-creation stage.
• Symmetry and Order: The use of 2-fold, 4-fold, and, more complexly, 10-fold radial symmetry (often via 10-pointed stars) reflects a “hidden order” behind the visible world.
• Water: Represented in gardens and courtyards, it symbolizes life, purity, and the blessings of Paradise. 

These, alongside the 5-pointed star (unity/solidarity) and the 9-pointed star (nine heavens/stages of knowledge), form a rich, non-idolatrous language within Islamic architecture, ceramics, and textiles.’

AI – ‘Yes, it is considered theoretically possible that undiscovered ancient Egyptian documents, which could align with the concept of “Sacred Registers,” are buried under the remains of the temple of Neith in Sais.

• Archaeological Evidence: Sais (modern Sa el-Hagar) was a major capital and cult centre of the goddess Neith, particularly from the 7th century BC onwards. The site includes a large “Great Pit” that likely contains the ruins of the main temple of Neith, and excavations have shown it to be a site with deep, untapped historical layers going back to the Predynastic period.
• The Myth of Sais: Historical accounts, particularly by Herodotus, describe Sais as a repository of immense sacred knowledge, including the “grave of Osiris” and the performance of his mysteries.
• Potential for Discovery: The site has been largely destroyed by sebakhin (farmers digging for mudbrick fertilizer) and earlier, less systematic excavations, but significant, deep, and water-logged areas remain that could contain preserved papyri or buried archives.
• The “Secret” Cache Scenario: It was a common practice in Egypt to bury older temple materials and documents within sacred enclosures, especially during times of crisis (such as the Persian invasions mentioned in records of Sais). 

While no definitive “Sacred Registers” (often associated with esoteric or New Age theories like the “Hall of Records”) have been found at Sais, the site remains one of the most promising, largely unexcavated areas for discovering hidden, ancient Egyptian knowledge.’ 

AI – ‘The relationship between the physical world and metaphysical, spiritual, or esoteric principles in ancient art and architecture was fundamental, treating built spaces and art objects as bridges between the earthly realm and the divine. Ancient civilizations—including Egyptian, Greek, and Indo-Aryan—used architecture and art to materialize abstract, invisible principles, such as cosmic order, afterlife journeys, and the harmony of the universe. 

Here is how this relationship was explored:

1. Sacred Geometry as a Bridge

Ancient cultures used geometry not just for structural stability, but to map the metaphysical onto the physical, believing that certain proportions reflected the inherent harmony of the cosmos. 

• The Golden Ratio & Proportions: Used in Greek temples and Egyptian architecture, these mathematical ratios were believed to mirror natural beauty and divine balance, creating environments that elevated the human spirit.
• Mandalas and Yantras: In Eastern traditions, complex geometric designs were used in meditation to help focus the mind and connect with the divine, acting as visual representations of higher states of consciousness.
• Fundamental Shapes: The tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron were associated with classical elements (earth, air, water, fire, ether) and spiritual attributes. 

2. Architecture as Cosmic Alignment (Egypt & Mesopotamia)

Ancient buildings, especially temples and tombs, were designed to align with celestial bodies, connecting earthly life with the movements of the gods. 

• The Pyramids (Egypt): The shape symbolized the sun’s rays, serving as a “cosmic machine” for the pharaoh’s soul to ascend to the heavens. The structure was aligned with cardinal directions and star constellations.
• Temple Orientation: Temples in Egypt and Mesopotamia were often oriented towards specific stars or solstices, ensuring the building remained in harmony with cosmic cycles.
• “False Doors”: In Egyptian tombs, these were not for physical passage but served as portals for the Ka (soul) of the deceased to receive offerings. 

3. Symbolism and Transformation in Art

Art served as a medium to render the metaphysical, such as spiritual forces or the afterlife, visible and tangible. 

• Metaphysical Symbols: The Ankh (life) and the Eye of Horus (protection) were used in Egyptian art to link the physical body with eternal, spiritual life.
• Symbolic Columns: In Egypt, column capitals modelled after lotus, papyrus, and palm plants symbolized creation, fertility, and eternal life, bringing nature’s vitality into sacred spaces.
• Iconography and Deities (Greece): Statues and reliefs of gods were not just decorations; they were considered to embody the divine, with the humanization of the divine reflecting the close, everyday relationship between the mortal and immortal worlds. 

4. Space as a Medium for Spiritual Experience

Architecture was designed to elicit specific emotional and spiritual states, such as awe, tranquillity, or fear of the divine. 

• Light and Atmosphere: The use of light, shadow, and scale was intentional. The dim, intimate sanctuaries in Egyptian temples contrasted with the grand, bright hypostyle halls, guiding the visitor from the mundane to the sacred.
• Acoustics: Temples and holy sites were often designed to enhance chanting and sound, creating an immersive, otherworldly experience. 

5. Symbolism of Materials

• Stone vs. Mud Brick: In Egypt, mud brick was used for houses (temporary/physical), while stone was reserved for temples and tombs (eternal/metaphysical), highlighting the distinction between the transient world and the enduring spirit.
• Gold and Colour: The use of gold in Byzantine art, for instance, represented divine light and heavenly glory, bringing the ethereal quality of heaven into the physical church, notes. 

Through these methods, ancient art and architecture served as a “poetic mimesis,” a magical activity linking the microcosm (humanity) with the macrocosm (universe). …

“Poetic mimesis” refers to the artistic imitation, representation, or re-creation of reality, actions, and human experiences through literature and poetry.

Derived from Greek, it goes beyond simple copying, involving a creative re-presentation of life—as it is, was, or should be—to evoke emotional or intellectual understanding.

Key aspects of poetic mimesis include:

Aristotelian Representation: Unlike Plato, who viewed it as a mere, inferior copy of reality, Aristotle argued that mimesis is a natural human instinct to understand the world, transforming reality into a symbolic, organized structure.

“Holding a Mirror to Nature”: It signifies selecting and presenting elements of life to reveal deeper truths, often focusing on human actions or emotions rather than just physical appearances.
Creative Re-creation: Poetic mimesis involves artistic interpretation, meaning the poet may enhance, alter, or idealize reality to generate a new understanding of the world.

Example: In literature, it is the process by which a writer creates believable characters, dialogues, or scenarios that reflect real-world experiences or emotions.

It is fundamentally the art of interpreting life through artistic form.’

AI – ‘Yes, sacred symbolism is widely considered a, if not the, hidden language of ancient art and architecture, acting as a bridge between the physical world and metaphysical, spiritual, or esoteric principles. This “language” was often used to encode deeper meanings, cosmological knowledge, or religious truths that were not immediately apparent to the uninitiated. 

Here is an analysis of how sacred symbolism serves as a hidden language in antiquity:

1. The “Code” of Sacred Geometry

Ancient architects, particularly in Egypt, Greece, and medieval Europe, employed sacred geometry—mathematical proportions and shapes believed to be divine—to structure their buildings. 

• Purpose: These structures were designed to elevate consciousness, embodying cosmic order in earthly materials.
• Examples: The pyramids of Egypt, Greek temples (e.g., the Parthenon), and Gothic cathedrals used specific ratios, such as the Golden Ratio, to create harmony and reflect divine principles.
• The Hidden Language: The “secret” lies in the fact that the geometric pattern (like the Flower of Life or Vesica Piscis) encodes the structure of reality or spiritual truths, often hidden in plain sight in floor plans or, in the case of cathedrals, the use of light. 

2. Symbols as “Secret Keys”

In many ancient traditions, symbols were not just decorative but acted as keepers of wisdom and guardians of secrets. 

• Esoteric Knowledge: Symbols such as the Ouroboros (snake eating its tail), the Labyrinth, or the Eye of Horus were used to represent complex cosmological ideas or metaphysical transformation, accessible only to those trained to understand them.
• Symbolic Language: This visual language allowed knowledge to be protected from misuse or transmitted only to initiates. 

3. Layers of Meaning in Ancient Art

Ancient and Renaissance art frequently used “disguised symbolism” or layered, esoteric, and political messages, as noted by researchers like Panofsky and Richard Stemp. 

• Hidden Messages: Symbols in paintings, such as a specific hand gesture, a flower, or a particular animal, could communicate religious doctrines, personal philosophies, or political critiques, conveying meanings beyond the surface narrative.
• Examples: A lily might represent purity or the Virgin Mary, while a single lit candle could symbolize the presence of God. 

4. Why the Language was Hidden

• Protection of Knowledge: Oral traditions and mystery schools often limited access to profound, “secret” knowledge, ensuring it was only available to those deemed ready.
• Communication in Times of Censorship: Artists often used hidden symbols to safely convey ideas that were religiously or politically charged.
• Accessibility vs. Esotericism: While some symbolism was meant for the public (a visual bible), other elements—particularly in alchemy or hermetic traditions—were deliberately veiled for initiates. 

In summary, sacred symbolism was a deliberate, sophisticated, and often “hidden” language utilized across ancient cultures to embed spiritual, philosophical, and metaphysical knowledge into the very fabric of their constructed and artistic environments.’ 

AI – ‘In theory, if Atlantis existed as described by Plato, its signature would consist of a convergence of geological, archaeological, and oceanographic anomalies. It would not merely be a sunken ship or a single building, but a massive, submerged, and highly organized urban structure located beyond the Strait of Gibraltar (the “Pillars of Heracles”). 

Based on Platonic dialogues and various theoretical, scientific searches, the signature of Atlantis would likely include:

1. Geological and Structural Signature

• Concentric Structure: The most famous signature is a city plan featuring alternating rings of water and land (two of land, three of water).
• Submerged Landmass/Platform: An underwater continent or large island, potentially on the Azores Plateau or near the coast of Spain/North Africa, which has subsided thousands of feet below sea level.
• Volcanic Context: Evidence of a cataclysmic, explosive volcanic eruption, accompanied by massive earthquakes and tsunamis.
• The “Eye of the Sahara” Similarity: The Richat Structure in Mauritania is often cited as a match, as it shows concentric circles, nearby mountainous terrain to the north, and evidence of water erosion. 

2. Physical and Archaeological Signature

• Advanced/Unique Metallurgy: The presence of Orichalcum, a rare, bright red or yellowish metal described as the second most valuable after gold.
• Unique Construction Material: Buildings and walls constructed with red, black, and white stone.
• Extensive Infrastructure: Evidence of a large navy, surrounding water channels, and massive harbor facilities.
• Advanced Antiquity: An urban site that predates known Bronze Age civilizations, fitting a timeline around 9,600 BC. 

3. Geographical and Sedimentological Signature

• Shallow Sediment Deposits: The location would likely be covered in thick layers of silt, mud, and sand, making it impassable for ancient navigation, which fits Plato’s account of the aftermath of the sinking.
• Tsunami Debris: Geological evidence of massive sediment displacement, consistent with a rapid submergence event. 

Top Theories on Potential Signatures

• The Azores Plateau: A widely discussed location where undersea plateaus suggest a large landmass that sank.
• Doñana National Park (Spain): Potential submerged ringed structures in the mudflats of southern Spain.
• The “Yellow Brick Road” (Hawaii): While proven to be natural hyaloclastite rock, this demonstrated what natural, but artificial-looking, seafloor structures might look like.
• Sardinia/Corsica: A theory suggesting the island platforms form the remains of a submerged continent. 

Despite these theories, mainstream science holds that the account is a philosophical allegory created by Plato, and no definitive evidence of a continent-sized city has been found.’

AI – ‘Based on the surviving literary evidence, there is no clear indication that Plutarch believed Plato’s account of Atlantis was a pure allegory, and there is stronger evidence suggesting he took it as a historical, though perhaps embellished, tradition. 

Plutarch, writing in the early Roman Empire (c. 46–120 AD), treated the story as a “lost” historical record rather than a fictional story, and he specifically linked it to the transmission of knowledge from Egyptian priests to Solon, rather than an invention of Plato. 

Evidence in Plutarch’s Writings

• Life of Solon: In his biography of Solon, Plutarch describes the Atlantis story as a, “large description, or rather fabulous account [mythos]” that Solon heard from the priests of Saïs. However, in this context, “fabulous” (or mythos) in the ancient sense does not necessarily mean “fictional” (allegory), but rather a story passed down about a distant, grand event.
• A “Historical” Project: Plutarch notes that Solon attempted to turn this Egyptian account into a poem, and later, “Plato, ambitious to elaborate and adorn the subject of the lost Atlantis … began the work”. This description presents the story as a real, “unoccupied” history that Plato was expanding upon, not as a metaphor for the Republic.
• Unfinished Work: Plutarch mentions that Plato was “late in beginning, and ended his life before his work” was finished, treating the Critias as a piece of historical narrative that was simply left incomplete, rather than an allegory that didn’t need to be finished.
• No Explicit Mentions of Allegory: While modern scholars often view the Atlantis story as an allegory of the ideal state, there is no passage in Plutarch’s work that explicitly states, “Plato was using Atlantis as a symbol for his political theories,” or “Atlantis is not a real place”. 

The Context of Ancient Interpretation

• Crantor’s Influence: Earlier in the Hellenistic period, the academic philosopher Crantor (c. 300 BC) is often cited as treating the story as historical truth, a view that was prominent in the early Roman period.
• The Shift to Allegory: The interpretation of Atlantis as a pure allegory primarily grew in popularity later, with Proclus (5th century AD) reporting that earlier people were divided on the issue, but it was generally later philosophers who pushed for the “allegory only” interpretation. 

Therefore, Plutarch’s own words in the Life of Solon and his treatment of the Timaeus-Critias in his biographies suggest he accepted it as an ancient tradition passed down from Egypt, rather than a literary allegory created by Plato.’

My next Q. was – ‘With the exception of Timaeus and Critias how many allegorical works did Plato write?’

AI – ‘Aside from the Timaeus and Critias, Plato did not write standalone allegorical works, as his primary medium was the Socratic dialogue. However, he frequently embedded allegories and myths within these larger philosophical texts to illustrate complex theories. 

The most prominent allegorical elements found in his other works include:

• The Republic: Contains three famous interconnected allegories in Books VI and VII: the Allegory of the Cave, the Analogy of the Sun, and the Simile of the Divided Line. It also concludes with the Myth of Er, an allegorical account of the afterlife.
• Phaedrus: Features the Allegory of the Chariot (the winged soul) and the myth of Theuth regarding the invention of writing.
• Symposium: Includes the Myth of the Androgyne (Aristophanes’ speech) and the “Ladder of Love”.
• Gorgias: Ends with an eschatological myth about the judgment of souls.’
• So, Plato’s account of Atlantis was an allegopry, then it was written as the only exception to his primary medium –
  the Socratic dialogue.

AI – ‘Yes, researchers have identified various megalithic structures in the Azores, particularly on Terceira Island, which challenge the belief that the archipelago was uninhabited before the 15th-century Portuguese discovery. Key findings include structures similar to European passage graves, stone anchors, rock art, and, on some islands, mysterious stepped, pyramid-like structures. 

Key details regarding megalithic structures in the Azores include:

• Terceira Island Structures: Several megalithic sites, particularly in the Pico do Espigão area, feature stone constructions resembling passage graves (dolmens). These often include a corridor leading to a chamber, sometimes with ceiling stones weighing over 2 tons.
• Stone Art and Carvings: Many monolithic blocks show cup-marks and carvings, including “chess board” shapes similar to those found in Galician Copper Age sites.
• Pyramidal Structures: Numerous, often geometric, pyramid-shaped stone piles have been documented on several islands, sometimes aligning with astronomical events like solstices.
• Ancient Cart Ruts: Similar to those found in Malta, ancient “cart ruts” have been identified, suggesting, along with the structures, a far older human presence than previously thought.
• Uncertain Origins: While some scholars argue these prove pre-Portuguese settlement (possibly Phoenician or Carthaginian), others caution that many sites require more rigorous archaeological dating to rule out later, early-settler construction. 

These discoveries have prompted ongoing research into the possibility of a Pre-Portuguese human presence on the islands.’

My next Q. – ‘What is the estimated age of the Megalithic Structures discovered in the Azores?’

AI – ‘ Megalithic structures, including dolmens, passage graves, and stone circles, discovered primarily on Terceira Island in the Azores, have been tentatively dated by some researchers to span from the Neolithic Age (before ~3000 BC) through the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age (up to ~1000 BC). However, these findings are considered highly controversial, with many professional archaeologists in Portugal viewing them as pseudoscientific, often attributing the structures to natural volcanic formations or later, post-15th-century, agricultural, or temporary constructions. Key details regarding the dating of these sites include:

• Controversial Dating: Researcher A.F. Rodrigues has proposed, based on the analysis of ceramic shards found in a, “cylindrical hole,” in a, “megalithic construction” on Terceira Island, that the area was visited or inhabited around the XIth century AD (950 ± 30 BP) or earlier.
• Older Interpretations: Some reports suggest that the “rock art” (cup marks) and specific, “megalithic” structures, which are compared to European passage graves, suggest a prehistoric, pre-Portuguese, human presence.
• Lack of Consensus: The majority of archaeologists and historians maintain that the Azores were uninhabited before the arrival of the Portuguese in the 15th century.
• Alternative Findings: Other studies, based on lake sediment cores, have indicated human impact (such as livestock introduction and burning) as early as 700 CE – 850 CE, which is still centuries earlier than the official 1427/1431 discovery. 

While some, “megalithic-like”, constructions on Terceira and São Miguel are in the range of 2500–4000 years old, they are not universally accepted as human-made, with the “underwater pyramid” often cited in this context frequently debunked as a natural volcanic feature.’

So, some of these structures are over 6,000 years old.

AI – ‘The megalithic (or Cyclopean) retaining wall at the Pnyx, the site of the Athenian democratic assembly, was constructed in phases, with key sections dating to the late 5th century B.C., and significant renovations around 330 B.C.. The massive, mortarless limestone block wall was built to hold a terrace, with some phases estimated from roughly 500 B.C. through the 4th century B.C.. 

Key Details and Usage Examples:

• Purpose: The wall created a level, amphitheater-like space for the Ekklisia (Assembly) to hold meetings.
• Construction: The wall uses massive, polygonal blocks, some weighing up to 60 tons, designed to support the hillside.
• Phases: The Pnyx had three main construction periods: early 5th century B.C., late 5th century B.C., and the mid-4th century B.C..
• Usage: It was the venue for speeches by figures like Pericles and Demosthenes. 

Synonyms and Associated Terms:

• Cyclopean wall (or Cyclopean masonry)
• Polygonal wall
• Retaining wall/terrace wall of the Pnyx
• Megalithic structure of the Assembly hill 

The site is located near the Acropolis on Pnyx Hill and remains a prominent example of ancient Greek civil engineering. ‘

So, it is over 6,000 years old.

Meanwhile, my journey into the distant past continues, as today I ordered copies of:

– ‘Moralia, Volume V: Isis and Osiris. The E at Delphi. The Oracles at Delphi No Longer Given in Verse. The Obsolescence of Oracles’ (Loeb Classical Library 306), by Plutarch.

– ‘Essays’ (Penguin Classics) Paperback, by Plutarch (Author), Ian Kidd (Editor, Introduction), Robin Waterfield (Translator).

– ‘The Rise And Fall of Athens: Nine Greek Lives: Theseus, Solon, Themistocles, Aristides, Cimon, Pericles, Nicias, Alcibiades, Lysander, with Excerpts from on the Malice of Herodotus’ (Penguin Classics), by Plutarch (Author), John Marincola (Translator), Ian Scott-Kilvert (Translator).

AI – ‘Plato’s Timaeus and Critias are companion dialogues, likely written around 360 BC, that explore cosmology and history. Timaeus provides a detailed, philosophical account of the universe’s creation by a divine craftsman (Demiurge). Critias is an unfinished dialogue presenting the story of Atlantis’s rise and fall, serving as a cautionary tale. Plato’s Timaeus (Cosmology)

• Focus: Explains the formation of the cosmos, the elements (earth, air, fire, water), and the human soul.
• Key Figure: Timaeus of Locri presents a long, detailed monologue.
• Concepts: Introduces the “Demiurge” (creator god) who orders the universe from chaos. It covers the properties of the physical world, the “world soul,” and the golden ratio.
• Purpose: Explores metaphysical ideas, linking the physical world’s structure to the need for virtue and understanding of the universe’s purpose. 

Plato’s Critias (Atlantis Myth)

• Focus: A, largely unfinished, story describing a prehistoric conflict between a noble, ideal Athens and a decadent Atlantis.
• Atlantis Narrative: Describes Atlantis as a massive, prosperous island kingdom founded by Poseidon that grew corrupt and was eventually punished by Zeus.
• Themes: Explores the danger of hubris, the decline of a society due to moral decay, and the contrast between virtue and material luxury.
• Context: The only primary source of the Atlantis legend. 

Contextual Details

• Intended Trilogy: These works were designed to be part of a trilogy—Timaeus, Critias, and an unwritten or lost dialogue called Hermocrates.
• Participants: Features Socrates, Timaeus, and Critias, set after a previous discussion of the ideal state.
• Legacy: Timaeus was the dominant cosmological text in the West for over a thousand years.’

According to Plato’s dialogues Timaeus and Critias, he leared about Atlantis through a chain of transmission. The character Critias claims he heard the story as a child from his grandfather (also named Critias), who in turn heard it from the Athenian statesman Solon. Solon reportedly learned the tale from Egyptian priests in Sais, who claimed it occurred 9,000 years prior. So, the story passed from Egyptian priests to Solon, then to Dropides (Solon’s friend), to Critias the Elder (the grandfather), and finally to Critias the Younger, who tells it to Socrates.

My copy of the Penguin Classic Translation of Plato’s Timaeus and Critias, by Thomas Kjeller Johansen and Desmond Lee, arrived today – 27.01.2026, and will be my bedtime reading over the next few weeks. See also my blog – ‘Is Atlantis based upon an anachronism?’,in which I wrote:

‘Plato presents the story of Atlantis in Timaeus and Critias as a story that was originally told to the Athenian statesman Solon by Egyptian priests, which was then passed down through several generations of Solon’s family orally, before Plato wrote it down. In other words, it appears that the story was transmitted to Plato through a longstanding oral tradition.

‘For most of human history, knowledge was passed down through oral tradition.’ (Leila Amineddoleh, ‘Words Words, Words: Books, Libraries, and the Law’, 28 Chap L. Review, 493 (22025), at 495, citing Patrick D.Nunn, ‘The Oldest True Stories in the Word’ (Oct. 18 2018).

[U]nless the version transmitted to Plato was based upon fiction, i.e. entirely invented, and provided Plato faithfully repeated what he was told, then logically, it is reasonable to conclude that the story of Atlantis is to an unknown extent, based upon fact. That is because ‘Registers’ – sacred or otherwise, typically record facts, including events, and are not designed to serve as literary devices for allegory.

Furthermore, if the story is allegorical, why would Plato make an allegation about the translation of ancient Egyptian records, i.e. about the Egyptian Sacred Registers, because if the originals existed in his time and were accessible the story could be verified, and if not, i.e. if the sacred registers which did once exist were lost, and one day could be found, they would provide documentary evidence either in contradiction or support of what Solon is reported by Plato to have said. Plato died in around 348/347 BC. 590 minus 348 = 242. In other words, Plato did not meet Solon. So, what he is reporting is not based upon contemporaneous first hand witness testimony.

The Sacred Registers have never been found, and copies may exist in undiscovered monuments which today, lie buried under the sands of Egypt.’

I will put up a further post after I have read Plato’s original text (as translated).

I am curious about the details related by Plato of Atlantis itself, and of its location, i.e if Atlantis actually existed.

My Q. to myself is – ‘Do the details in the story fit with the geography?’

My next Q. to AI is – ‘Are the Azores a possible location of Atlantis, i.e. was Atlantis the Azores?

AI – ‘The idea that the Azores archipelago represents the remnants of Atlantis is a popular, albeit scientifically unproven, theory. While it is one of many locations proposed for the legendary lost city, mainstream geology and archaeology do not support the idea that a large continent existed in that region, nor that the Azores are the remnants of such a landmass. 

Here is a breakdown of the arguments for and against the Azores being Atlantis:

Arguments Supporting the Azores Theory

• Geographic Position: Plato’s account in Timaeus and Critias places Atlantis “beyond the Pillars of Hercules” (the Strait of Gibraltar). The Azores are located in the mid-Atlantic, roughly 900 miles west of the Portuguese coast, fitting the general description of an island in that vicinity.
• Volcanic Activity & Submergence: The Azores sit atop the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, a geologically active area formed by the intersection of three tectonic plates (the Azores Triple Junction). Proponents argue that the islands are the mountaintops of a once-larger, submerged landmass that sank during cataclysmic volcanic or tectonic events.
• “Sunken Kingdom” Characteristics: The islands feature hot and cold water springs, fertile soil, and mountainous terrain, which match some of the descriptions given by Plato.
• Proponents & Specific Claims: In 1882, US Congressman Ignatius L. Donnelly popularized the idea in his book Atlantis: The Antediluvian World. More recently, researchers have highlighted potential “pyramid-like” underwater formations and aligned mounds found near the Azores (e.g., near Pico and São Miguel), suggesting they could be pre-Portuguese, man-made structures. 

Arguments Against the Azores Theory

• Geological Evidence: Scientific investigations show the Azores are volcanic islands that formed on the ocean floor and have remained in their current, or even higher, elevation relative to sea level for millions of years. There is no evidence of a large, submerged continent having existed in that area during human history.
• No Substantial Submersion: Core samples from the Azores plateau have shown that the region has been an undersea plateau for millions of years.
• Timing Mismatch: Plato claimed Atlantis sank around 9,600 BC. There is no archaeological evidence of an advanced, “advanced” civilization existing in the mid-Atlantic at that time.
• Interpretation of the Story: Most mainstream scholars consider Plato’s account of Atlantis to be a philosophical allegory regarding the dangers of hubris and empire, rather than a historical or geographical record. 

Conclusion

While the Azores provide a compelling, picturesque, and geographically reasonable location for a “sunken island” theory, the idea that they were Atlantis is considered pseudoscience or speculative fiction by the scientific community, as it lacks concrete geological and archaeological evidence.’

My next Q. is – ‘Have any artefacts ever been found in Europe to support the theory that Atlantis actually existed?’

AI – ‘No, no universally accepted or conclusive archaeological artifacts have ever been found in Europe (or elsewhere) to support the theory that Plato’s Atlantis actually existed as a historical, advanced civilization. 

While various finds have been sensationalized or proposed as evidence of Atlantis, they have either been dismissed by the scientific community, found to be natural formations, or attributed to known, later cultures (such as Minoan Crete). 

Proposals and Supposed Evidence (and Why They Fail):

• Submerged Structures near Spain (Doñana/Cádiz): In 2011, researchers identified ring-shaped, buried structures in marshes near Cádiz, Spain, that some claimed matched Plato’s description. However, these were not verified as Atlantis. Other “circular ruins” found nearby were later identified as experimental ponds for a study on zooplankton.
• Orichalcum Ingots (Sicily): In 2014, divers found 39 ingots of “orichalcum” (a rare metal described by Plato as covering Atlantis’s temples) in a shipwreck off Sicily. Analysis showed the metal was an alloy of copper, zinc, and lead, common in the ancient world, and the shipwreck was from the 6th century BC, thousands of years later than the supposed date of Atlantis.
• “Swedish Atlantis” (Baltic Sea): Discoveries of 10,000-year-old Stone Age tools off the coast of Sweden have beentermed a “Swedish Atlantis” by media, but these are simply underwater settlements from the time when the sea level was lower, not an advanced civilization.
• Sardinia’s Ancient Canals: Some researchers suggest the Sulcis region in Sardinia features sunken concentric canal systems. However, these are generally considered to be related to the Nuragic civilization, not a “lost continent”.
• Thera/Santorini Eruption: The Minoan eruption of Santorini around 1600 BC is a popular theory for the source of the legend, as a thriving civilization was indeed buried. However, this happened over 1,000 years later than Plato’s timeline and in the Mediterranean, not the Atlantic. 

Scientific Consensus:
Most archaeologists and historians consider Atlantis a work of fiction created by the philosopher Plato in 360 B.C. to illustrate his political and ethical theories, not a historical account. While many submerged ruins exist in Europe—such as those in Doggerland or the Mediterranean—they represent known Neolithic or Bronze Age cultures, not the civilization described in the Timaeus and Critias dialogues.’ 

My next Q. – ‘Are any Ancient symbols and Magic purported to be derived from Atlantis?’

AI – ‘Yes, numerous ancient symbols, occult practices, and magical traditions are purported by modern occultists, New Age spiritualists, and alternative history theorists to be derived from the lost civilization of Atlantis. In these, often, Atlanteans are described as having used advanced technology combined with supernatural powers, such as crystal energy, before the civilization’s destruction. 

Purported Atlantean Symbols and Magical Concepts 

• Concentric Circles: Representing the capital city of Atlantis, this motif is believed by some researchers to have been spread worldwide by Atlantean survivors, appearing in ancient Celtic, Native American, and Mediterranean art.
• The “Cross of Atlantis”: Sometimes depicted as a central point with concentric circles, this is identified in some esoteric circles as a symbol for the capital’s structure.
• Snake and Dragon Symbolism: Associated with “enlightenment” or “illumination,” these symbols are claimed to have been used by Atlantean priests, with the knowledge passing to Egypt and South America.
• Atlantean Runes/Ogham: Some esoteric theories suggest that early writing styles, such as Druidic Ogham, Viking Runes, and ancient Hebrew texts, were adapted from a more ancient Atlantean script.
• Crystal Power: A major aspect of Atlantean lore (popularized by psychic Edgar Cayce) is the use of massive crystals for energy, healing, and, eventually, in a corrupt form, that caused the continent’s destruction.
• The Emerald Tablets: Often linked to Thoth, the Atlantean, these tablets are cited in esoteric literature as a source of secret knowledge and alchemy from the sunken continent. 

Origins of these Beliefs

• Theosophy: Helena Blavatsky, founder of Theosophy, claimed in The Secret Doctrine (1888) that Atlanteans were a “root race” with psychic abilities who brought their culture to Egypt and the Americas.
• Edgar Cayce: Known as the “sleeping prophet,” Cayce claimed that through, channeling, he identified many people as reincarnations of Atlanteans, who described advanced “super-science” that blended magic and technology.
• Alternative History: Authors like Ignatius Donnelly (1882) stimulated the belief that all ancient civilization descended from Atlantis, leading to the idea that symbols like the pyramid, the swastika, and the serpent represent Atlantean knowledge. 

Important Context

• Plato’s Fiction: The story of Atlantis originates solely from the Greek philosopher Plato in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias (c. 360 BCE). There is no evidence it was part of any earlier tradition.
• Pseudohistory: While these symbols are popular in occult and New Age circles, they are considered pseudohistory or folklore, rather than established archaeological facts.’ 

My next Q. is – ‘Theoretically, is there a direct link between Alchemy and Atlantis, i.e. the Emerald Tablets?’

AI – ‘Theoretically, yes—a direct link between alchemy and Atlantis exists within esoteric, occult, and New Age literature, primarily mediated through the text known as The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean. However, this connection is not supported by academic history, which distinguishes the modern “Tablets” from the classical “Tablet.” 

1. The Direct Link: The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean 

This specific text provides the most direct, albeit mythological, link.

• Source: Published in the 1940s/1950s by Maurice Doreal (Claude Doggins), leader of the “Brotherhood of the White Temple”.
• The Narrative: Doreal claimed these were a translation of tablets created by “Thoth,” an Atlantean priest-king who, after the sinking of Atlantis, migrated to Egypt and founded the Egyptian civilization.
• The Connection: The texts discuss Atlantis’s advanced scientific achievements, the construction of the Great Pyramid, and, crucially, secrets of alchemy and transmutation (achieving the Philosopher’s Stone) as an ancient Atlantean science.
• Nature of the Tablets: Described as imperishable, emerald-green tablets created through alchemical, rather than natural, processes. 

2. The Traditional “Emerald Tablet” (Smaragdine Table)

The traditional, historically recognized Emerald Tablet is distinct from the 20th-century “Tablets of Thoth”. 

• Origin: Traced to 7th-9th century Arabic texts (Kitab Balaniyus) and later translated into Latin, this text was considered foundational to Western alchemy.
• Legend: Attributed to Hermes Trismegistus, a blend of the Egyptian god Thoth and Greek god Hermes.
• The Link: While not explicitly mentioning Atlantis in its earliest forms, it is the foundational text for transmutation—the core of alchemy—which esotericists often argue was passed down from a more ancient, lost civilization. 

3. Esoteric & Mythological Connection

In various mystical traditions, the link is established through:

• Thoth as Atlantean: In these narratives, Thoth is not just an Egyptian deity but an “Atlantean priest-king” who preserved the advanced, spiritual-material science of his lost homeland in the form of alchemy.
• The “Above and Below” Principle: The famous phrase “As above, so below” from the Emerald Tablet is used to explain how the macrocosm (universe/Atlantis) is reflected in the microcosm (man/laboratory), linking the spiritual evolution of Atlanteans to the alchemical process.
• The “Halls of Amenti”: The tablets allegedly detail how Thoth hid these secrets under the Great Sphinx, which serves as a repository for Atlantic knowledge. 

Summary Table: Two Different Texts

Feature	Emerald Tablets of Thoth (The Atlantean)	The Emerald Tablet (Smaragdine Table)
Origin	Published 1939-1940s by M. Doreal	7th–9th century Arabic text
Connection to Atlantis	Explicit: Written by Thoth the Atlantean	Implicit: Part of “ancient wisdom”
Content	Narrative + Alchemical Principles	Cryptic Alchemical Recipe/Philosophy
Academic View	Pseudohistorical / Modern New Age	Historical Hermetic Text

In summary, the direct link is found in Doreal’s 20th-century interpretation, which frames alchemy as a legacy of Atlantis preserved by Thoth in the Emerald Tablets.’

My next Q. is – ‘What is the basis of the statistical probability that Atlantis existed is zero?’

AI – ‘The scientific and historical consensus that the statistical probability of Atlantis’s existence is zero is based on the contradiction between Plato’s description and the known realities of geology, oceanography, and archaeology. The story is treated as a philosophical allegory rather than a historical record. Here is the basis for the probability of its existence being considered zero:

• Geological Impossibility: Modern plate tectonics show that the ocean floor does not sink or contract in the manner described, leaving no place for a massive continent to disappear in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
• Absence of Oceanographic Evidence: Despite thorough seafloor mapping and ocean exploration, no evidence of a sunken, advanced continent-sized landmass has ever been found.
• The “Sole Source” Problem: The only records of Atlantis come from the Greek philosopher Plato (around 360 BCE). There are no independent Egyptian records, nor any mention of it in other ancient Greek texts, despite the story claiming it was a massive power that fought ancient Athens.
• Geographical Contradictions: Plato placed Atlantis beyond the “Pillars of Hercules” (the Strait of Gibraltar). However, the description of it being larger than “Libya and Asia together” does not align with any known geographical feature in the Atlantic that could have submerged.
• Misaligned Timeline: Plato claimed the civilization existed 9,000 years before his time (roughly 9600 BCE), which is far too early for the existence of an advanced civilization with sophisticated architecture, metallurgy, and shipping capabilities as described.
• Proven Pedagogical Purpose: Scholars believe Plato created Atlantis as a fictional, idealized, yet morally corrupted state to serve as a foil for his idealized Athens, using the story to illustrate a cautionary tale about political hubris. 

While some scholars speculate that Plato may have loosely based the tale on real, smaller disasters, such as the eruption of Thera (Santorini) in 1600 BCE or the submersion of the city of Helike, the specific, monumental, and, technologically advanced civilization described by Plato is considered a myth.’

The final Q. I pose in the Blog is – ‘As a percentage – To what extent is the basis of the statistical probability that Atlantis existed is zero based upon the belief that The story is treated as a philosophical allegory rather than a historical record.?’

AI – ‘While there is no formal “statistical probability” calculated for the existence of Atlantis, the academic consensus that the story is a philosophical allegory is so dominant that the likelihood of its existence is effectively treated as 0% by mainstream historians and scientists. 

The basis for this “zero probability” rests on several key scholarly findings:

• Philosophical Intent: Most scholars agree that Plato, who first mentioned Atlantis in the dialogues Timaeus and Critias (c. 360 BCE), intended it as a cautionary tale about hubris rather than a historical record.
• Lack of Corroboration: No written records of Atlantis exist outside of Plato’s works, and no traces of such a civilization have been found despite modern advances in ocean-floor mapping.
• Internal Inconsistency: Plato dates Atlantis to 9,000 years before his time (c. 9600 BCE), which is thousands of yearsbefore the earliest known cities or the founding of Athens, the city Atlantis supposedly fought.
• Scientific Disproval: Exploration by oceanographers like Robert Ballard has found no geological evidence of a sunken continent in the Atlantic, confirming that the landmass described by Plato never existed. 

While a small percentage of the public (roughly 57% in some surveys) may believe in Atlantis, and some scholars speculate it could have been inspired by real events like the Thera eruption, they still regard the “Atlantis” described by Plato as a fictional construct. ‘