‘Aesthetically, could it be argued that the Giza Necropolis creates a hologram of Orion’s Belt?

Posted on by

My 1st Q. – ‘Does any Pyramid create a hologram?’

AI – ‘No, a pyramid itself does not create a hologram, but a pyramid-shaped reflector is used to create the illusion of a 3D floating image known as a “Pepper’s Ghost” effect. When an upside-down pyramid is placed on a smartphone or tablet screen playing a specially formatted video, its four reflective sides project four identical images, which, when viewed together, appear to form a 3D object floating in the center of the pyramid.

How it works:

  1. 1. Pepper’s Ghost illusion:

The effect relies on the well-known Pepper’s Ghost illusion, which uses reflections to create ghostly, floating images. 

  • 2. Four-panel videos:

A special “hologram video” is played on the screen, divided into four panels, with each panel displaying a different angle of the 3D object. 

  • 3. Reflection in the pyramid:

The pyramid’s four transparent, angled sides reflect these four images. 

  • 4. Illusion of a 3D object:

When the viewer looks into the pyramid, these four reflections converge, creating the illusion that a solid 3D object is floating and moving inside. 

How to create the effect:

  1. Make a pyramid: Cut four identical trapezoidal shapes from a transparent material like a CD cover or clear plastic. 
  2. Assemble the pyramid: Tape the four pieces together to form an upside-down pyramid shape. 
  3. Play the video: Place the pyramid in the center of a smartphone or tablet screen. 
  4. Use hologram content: Play a specially formatted hologram video. 
  5. Enjoy the illusion: View the floating 3D-like image from different sides. 

My 2nd Q. – ‘Aesthetically, could it be argued that the Giza Necropolis creates a hologram of Orion’s Belt?

AI – ‘From an aesthetic standpoint, one could argue that the Giza Necropolis creates a kind of “hologram” of Orion’s Belt, but this concept is based on a discredited fringe theory and an exercise in artistic interpretation, not archaeological fact. The comparison draws on the visual parallels of the Orion Correlation Theory, which connects the layout of the three main Giza pyramids to the three stars of Orion’s Belt. 

Here is how the aesthetic argument is constructed and why it is not considered archaeologically valid:

The aesthetic argument for a “hologram”

  • The visual parallel: In this view, the arrangement of the three main Giza pyramids—Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure—is seen as an earthly reflection of Orion’s Belt. The two larger pyramids align in a relatively straight line, mirroring the two brighter stars, Alnilam and Alnitak. The slightly smaller pyramid of Menkaure is offset, much like the fainter star, Mintaka, is slightly askew in the constellation.
  • The “holographic” concept: The idea of a hologram suggests a three-dimensional image projected into space. Aesthetically, the pyramids function this way by representing the three-dimensional, spatial relationship of the stars in a physical, earthly form. When viewed from a specific perspective, the layout on the ground resembles the pattern in the night sky.
  • Symbolic and religious meaning: Proponents of the theory note that the ancient Egyptians associated the constellation Orion with Osiris, the god of rebirth and the afterlife. From this perspective, the “hologram” is a divine connection, allowing the deceased pharaoh’s soul to ascend and merge with the “imperishable stars” of the afterlife.
  • A “celestial map”: The concept is extended to other features of the Giza plateau. In this expanded—and less scientifically accepted—view, the Sphinx is aligned with the constellation Leo, and the Nile River is positioned to mimic the Milky Way, completing a vast symbolic map of the heavens on Earth. 

The counter-argument from archaeology and astronomy

While the aesthetic comparison is compelling, archaeologists and astronomers have largely dismissed the Orion correlation theory as fringe or pseudo-scientific. The “hologram” concept, therefore, relies on an aesthetically pleasing, but scientifically baseless, premise. 

  • Pareidolia: Critics argue that the apparent correlation is simply a case of pareidolia, the human tendency to see familiar patterns in random or unrelated data.
  • Misrepresented evidence: The theory’s proponents have had to take liberties with the data to make the alignment work, such as inverting star maps to match the pyramid layout.
  • Anachronistic star positions: Due to a phenomenon called axial precession, the stars of Orion’s Belt were in different positions during the Fourth Dynasty (~2500 BCE) when the pyramids were built. The correlation only “aligns” if you project the star positions to around 10,500 BCE, a date with no archaeological support for pyramid construction.
  • No ancient Egyptian textual evidence: There is no evidence in ancient Egyptian texts or records to suggest the pyramids were intentionally designed to represent Orion’s Belt.
  • Different building timelines: The three main pyramids were not planned all at once. The smaller Pyramid of Menkaure, for instance, appears to have been an afterthought, challenging the idea of a single, coordinated master plan to map the stars. 

In summary, while the “hologram” of Orion’s Belt is an imaginative and aesthetically powerful way to interpret the Giza Necropolis, it is built upon an unproven and widely discredited archaeological theory. The concept is a modern artistic and symbolic reading, not an attested historical or scientific fact.’

My 3rd Q. – ‘If you invert the Giza Necropolis does it bear any similarity to Orion’s Belt?

AI – ‘Yes, to make the Giza pyramids appear similar to Orion’s Belt, you do need to invert them, but this is part of the controversial Orion Correlation Theory and not a precise match between the actual structures and the stars as they are today. The theory, proposed by Robert Bauval and Gilbert Gilbert in The Orion Mystery, suggests the pyramids on the ground represent Orion’s Belt, but this comparison requires flipping one of the images to achieve a resemblance. However, astronomers and scientists note that the pyramid alignment isn’t perfect, and the stars in Orion’s Belt have also shifted in position over the millennia since the pyramids were built.
 

The Orion Correlation Theory (OCT)

  • The Premise:

The OCT suggests that the three main pyramids of Giza (Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure) are laid out to mirror the three stars of Orion’s Belt. 

  • The Inversion:

To achieve this resemblance, proponents of the theory must invert the map of the pyramids. One argument is that this mirrors the celestial view from above. 

  • Criticisms:
  • Not a Perfect Match: The positions of the pyramids do not perfectly align with the stars of Orion’s Belt, even with the inversion. 
  • Precession: The apparent positions of the stars change over vast periods of time due to the Earth’s axial wobble (precession), meaning the alignment wouldn’t have been identical to the pyramids’ construction thousands of years ago. 
  • Selective Comparison: The theory often focuses only on the three main pyramids, ignoring the many other pyramids in the Giza Necropolis and elsewhere in Egypt. 

Astronomical Evidence

  • While the OCT is a controversial theory, the Giza Pyramids do show significant astronomical alignment in other ways. 
  • The four sides of the Great Pyramid of Giza are precisely aligned with the cardinal directions (north, south, east, west). 
  • The builders are believed to have used celestial observation, such as the apparent motion of stars, to achieve this precise alignment.’

My 4th Q. – ‘In what year would the inverted Giza Necropolis have mirrored Orion’s Belt with any astronomical precision/’

AI – ‘An “inverted” Giza Necropolis, as described in the Orion Correlation Theory, would not have mirrored Orion’s Belt with astronomical precision in any year, as the pyramids’ configuration is a mirror image of the belt, not an inversion. Instead, the theory suggests the best astronomical fit for the Giza pyramids to represent Orion’s Belt occurred around 10,500 BCE or 10,450 BCE. This alignment would have occurred when Orion was at its closest point to the southern horizon during the precession of the equinoxes.
 

Why the Theory is Debunked

  • The Pyramids’ “Inverted” Configuration:

The theory posits that the pyramids are a mirror image of the constellation because the triangle of the pyramids points north, while Orion’s Belt triangle points south. 

  • Imperfect Alignment:

Even when trying to match the pyramids to the stars in a way that minimizes the mismatch, a perfectly accurate alignment is not achieved. 

  • Lack of Evidence:

Most archaeologists and astronomers do not support the theory, considering it a fringe idea with no good reason for the builders to have emulated Orion. 

  • Different Alignments:

The Giza pyramids are, in fact, precisely aligned to the four cardinal directions. 

The Best (Hypothesized) Fit 

  • Around 10,500-10,450 BCE:

This period represents the closest match to the alignment proposed by Robert Bauval and others who support the Orion Correlation Theory.

  • Precession of the Equinoxes:

The specific time is based on the ~25,900-year cycle of the precession of the equinoxes, which shifts the celestial sphere’s position over time’

AI considers the Orion Correlation Theory to have been debunked.

So, if it turns out on the basis of astronomical evidence, that AI is not correct about ‘debunking’, then according to the ‘Orion Correlation Theory’, it appears that a precise ‘holographic’ image existed, i.e. was created, between 10,500-10,450 BCE – over 14.5 thousand years ago.

If that time span is astronomically correct, then civilization on Earth is much older than archaeologists conventionally believe it to be.

Comments aded:

‘What is a hologram?‘

AI – ‘A holographic image is a three-dimensional, realistic image created by the interference pattern of light waves, allowing viewers to see depth and different angles of the object or scene, much like looking at a real object. Created by splitting a laser beam into two parts—a reference beam and an object beam—and recombining them on a light-sensitive medium, this technique captures the light field and reproduces it to form a 3D image with true depth and parallax. 

How It’s Made

1. Laser Split:A single laser beam is split into two identical beams. 

2. Beam Distribution:One beam, the “reference beam,” is directed directly onto a photographic plate. The other beam, the “object beam,” is directed onto the object to be recorded, then reflected onto the same photographic plate. 

3. Interference Pattern:When the two beams meet on the plate, they interfere with each other, creating an intricate interference pattern that encodes the entire light field of the object. 

4. Image Reconstruction:When the recorded plate (the hologram) is illuminated with a suitable light source (often similar to the reference beam), the interference pattern diffracts the light, recreating the original light field and forming the 3D holographic image. 

Key Characteristics

  • Three-Dimensional Depth:The image appears to have volume and depth, not just a flat, 2D representation. 
  • Parallax:You can change your viewing angle, and the image will shift perspective, revealing different sides of the object, just as you would with a real-world object. 
  • Lifelike Reproduction:Holograms can create a virtual clone of the original object, duplicating its features and providing a very realistic experience. 

Uses and Applications

  • Anti-Counterfeiting:Holograms are used on credit cards, currency, and product packaging for security and brand protection because they are difficult to replicate. 
  • Art and Design:They allow for the creation of immersive art installations where viewers can interact with and move around the artwork. 
  • Digital Displays:Advances in holographic technology allow for the creation of digital displays that show live, 3D images that can be viewed from any angle.’

‘Do any ancient texts contain instructions about how to create a holographic image?

AI – ‘No, no ancient texts contain instructions on how to create a holographic image. The technology for creating holograms relies on the physics of laser light, a principle only discovered and explored in the mid-20th century. Any ancient accounts that seem to describe similar phenomena are a matter of interpretation, not evidence of advanced technical knowledge. Holography requires modern technologyThe principles of holography are based on specific modern scientific discoveries that did not exist in the ancient world.

  • Laser technology: Holography requires a laser, an intense source of coherent light where the light waves have the same frequency and phase. The first working laser was not invented until 1960.
  • Physical principles: Hungarian-British physicist Dennis Gabor first developed the theory of holography in 1947, and he was later awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work. The technique relies on the complex interference and diffraction of light waves, a detailed understanding of which was a 20th-century achievement.
  • Recording mediums: Modern holograms require specialized photographic emulsions or digital sensors to record the microscopic interference patterns created by laser light. Ancient societies possessed no such materials. 

Ancient accounts are reinterpretedSome people have suggested ancient texts describe holography, but these interpretations are not supported by the evidence. 

  • Divination: Ancient cultures, including the Greeks and Romans, practiced divination using reflective surfaces like mirrors and water. Some modern observers have likened these practices to holography, but they were ritualistic, not technological.
  • Projecting images: The “Pepper’s ghost” illusion, a technique for making ghostly images appear, was developed in the 19th century. This and other projection illusions rely on reflections on glass or other transparent surfaces, not holography, and should not be confused with ancient accounts of seeing images. 

Examples of misleading connections

  • The Akashic Records: In some new-age circles, the spiritual concept of the Akashic Records has been connected to the modern scientific theory of a “holographic universe”. This is a modern, metaphorical comparison, not a description found in ancient Hindu texts.
  • Mythology and science fiction: Claims of ancient holographic technology often blur the line between scientific discovery and mythology or science fiction, such as with accounts of “ancient technology” found in fictional universes like the Stargate franchise.’

‘Is a hologram an optical illusion?’

AI – ‘A hologram is not just an optical illusion; it is a physical recording of a light field that reproduces a three-dimensional light field using diffraction, creating a realistic, albeit reconstructed, 3D image with depth and parallax as if looking into the original scene. While it produces the illusion of depth, a true hologram is an optical reality, a precise reconstruction of the original object’s 3D space, unlike a simple trick of the eye or a painted image that might misinterpret reality.
 

Key Characteristics

  • Physical Recording:

A hologram is a physical recording on a medium, storing information about the light waves that formed the original object. 

  • Light Field Reproduction:

When illuminated correctly, the hologram diffracts light to accurately reproduce the light field of the original 3D scene. 

  • Realistic Depth and Parallax:

Viewers can move their heads, and the image will shift and change perspective, just like a real object, providing realistic visual depth cues. 

  • Not a Brain Trick:

Unlike a traditional optical illusion, which misleads the brain into perceiving something differently from reality, a hologram presents a reconstructed version of reality through light. 

In Summary

While a hologram presents a 3D image that can seem like a trick of the eye, it’s a scientifically proven method of recording and reconstructing a genuine 3D light field. Therefore, it is an optical reality, not an illusion in the sense of a misperception of reality. 

‘Is the invisible Pyramid at Ollantayambo in the Sacred Valley of the Incas an Optical illusion?’

AI – ‘Yes, the “invisible pyramid” in Ollantaytambo is considered an optical illusion, where the arrangement of natural features and the site’s architecture create the appearance of a three-dimensional pyramid when viewed from a specific vantage point, such as from the air or during certain celestial alignments. This illusion is part of the area’s larger celestial interconnectedness, with the pyramid motif also appearing in ancient solar observatories and in the landscape’s alignment with the sun’s solstice beams.
 

How the illusion works:

  • Perspective:

The illusion stems from perspective, where a flat plain of fields and walls appears to form a pyramid when viewed from the correct angle. 

  • Celestial Alignment:

The effect is often noted when looking at the site from a distance, particularly from the direction of the Inca quarry. 

  • Architectural Features:

The illusion is enhanced by the surrounding architecture and natural features of the area, which are themselves aligned with the sun and stars. 

Significance:

  • The illusion is part of the larger “celestial interconnectedness” of the Ollantaytambo site, which was a complex ancient observatory and religious center. 
  • This motif is tied to the legendary emergence of the Incas from the earth at this location, known as Paqariq Tampu or “House of Dawn”.’

‘What is the invisible Pyramid at Ollantayambo in the Sacred Valley of the Incas?’

AI – ‘The “invisible pyramid” at Ollantaytambo refers to the way the Inca storehouses (qollqas) appear as a pyramid shape when viewed from the town or across the river, a perspective created by their terraced, cascading construction on the slope and their alignment with the town’s layout. This architectural effect is often highlighted by a large carved face of the deity Wiracocha on the rock face above the storehouses, leading visitors to the ruins above the town.  

What it is: 

  • A Natural-Looking Pyramid

The storehouses, or qollqas, are built into the hillside, appearing as a series of terraced structures.

  • A View from the Town

When viewed from a certain distance or angle, these cascading stone structures form a visual pyramid shape, according to some observers and guides.

What it is not:

  • A Single Structure

There isn’t a dedicated pyramid structure but rather a collection of terraced storehouses that create the illusion. 

  • A Significant Religious Site

While the area is rich in Incan history, the qollqas were primarily functional buildings for storing agricultural crops. 

Key Aspects:

  • Location:

The storehouses are located on the hillside above the town of Ollantaytambo. 

  • The Wiracocha Face:

A prominent carving of the deity Wiracocha is located above the storehouses, making it a recognizable landmark. 

  • Historical Context:

Ollantaytambo is a living Inca town and a significant ceremonial and defensive site built by Emperor Pachacuti. 

  • Perspective:

The “invisible pyramid” is a result of the way the Incan architecture integrates with the natural landscape, offering a unique viewpoint of the ruins from across the river.’ 

See also: