My third essay for the IAL’s Diploma in Art Law course is,
‘The case for repatriating the Parthenon Marbles using a trust structure as
under international law National Museums have a broad “fiduciary” duty to
strive to be better collaborative custodians of world heritage.’ –
I have
started to write the essay, which I am aiming to submit along with my second
essay in September. The working draft appears on the ‘Mediation of Art &
Music Disputes’ page at www.carlislam.co.uk.
Structure
& Content:
· Introduction.
· Existence
of a ‘Collaborative Custodial Duty.’
· The
author’s ‘Fiduciary Theory of Art.’
· International
Law.
· Distributive
Justice.
· Use
of a Trust as a vehicle for collaboration in repatriating the Parthenon Marbles
[‘PM’] to Greece.
· Conclusion.
Extract:
‘The
analytical starting point is does a Collaborative Custodial Duty exist? The
author submits that theoretical underpinnings for the existence of a
Collaborative Custodial Duty include:
(i) The
author’s ‘Fiduciary Theory of Art’.
(ii)
International Law.
(iii)
[Principles of] Distributive Justice. …
[Under
International Law] principles of ‘collaborative’ restitution can be derived
from at least three sources:
(i) The
precepts underlying International Conventions … ,
(ii) The
Philosophy of International law.
(iii) Principles
& Norms of International Humanitarian Law (‘IHL’) in relation to Cultural
Heritage.
Applying
doctrinal principles of ‘fiduciary government’ … are states obliged under
International Law to act, or should they be obliged to act, as
custodians/fiduciaries of cultural property?
In ‘A
Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens’, Evan J Criddle and Evan-Fox
Decent developed a fiduciary theory of jus cogens (i.e. norms that
command peremptory authority, superseding conflicting treaties and customs in
international law], arguing that, “States must honor peremptory norms
as basic safeguards of dignity because they stand in a fiduciary
relationship with all persons subject to their power and therefore bear
specific duties to guarantee equal security under the rule of law … [and]
that this fiduciary model of state sovereignty advances international
human rights discourse beyond vague notions of ‘public policy’,
‘international consensus’, and ‘normative hierarchy’ toward a more
theoretically defensible and analytically determinate account of peremptory
norms.” …
The
intersection in International Law between:
(i)
obligations erga omnes; and
(ii) jus cogens rules,
is a
potentially rich source of principles that can be applied in the practice of
repatriating cultural property through a process of ‘collaborative’ Cultural
Heritage Diplomacy. However, the underlying foundational principles require
scholarly formulation, definition and classification.’ …